Charles Rot S Macbeth Play Review Essays

Charles Rot S Macbeth Play Review Essays Charles Rot S Macbeth Play Review Essay Charles Rot S Macbeth Play Review Essay In the theatre production of Macbeth, directed by Charles Roy, we see a modernized version of the play, set in 20th century Syria, with a young but experienced cast. The contemporary take on Macbeth is fresh and original, but still holds true to the plays original values and themes. The cast was able to clearly illustrate the themes and characters, without watering down the play. The intense fight scenes and dynamic noises and special effects were able to keep the attention of easily distracted teenagers in the audience. Charles Roy definitely made some noticeable changes to the play, some I liked, and others I was not too crazy about. The main change that this production of Macbeth has made is the fact that the play is modernized. Since this timeless Shakespearean tragedy was written in the sasss, some of the lines spoken directly contradicted what was on the set. For example when Banquet was killed in Act 3 Scene 3, The First Murderer said, His horses go about. (Line 1 3), while on set there were motorcycles. Knowing that the play was modernized this was an easy connection to make, but for some people, it could make for some confusion. Also, the play is set in Syria rather than Scotland, making the references to Ireland and England seem very outlandish, considering the distance from Ireland to Syria. Another difference is the fact that Duncan was killed on stage. This addition to the play is something have mixed feelings about. It helped with the understanding of the play, but took away from imagining hat happened and from the tension that comes along with imagining. Another major change from the book to play of Macbeth is the absence of fair is foul,foul is 1 Scene 1). Since the supernatural is a substantial and meaningful theme in Macbeth, leaving out the base of the theme, really made it hard to follow the theme and underplayed the supernatural. Over all, was not a fan of the changes to the play, as some took away from the understanding of the play, while others took away from the suspense and imagination. One thing I was a fan off were the special effects. The writing appearing on the walls helped connect scenes and characters to major themes through out the play, and also emphasized words or phrases that have to do with the characterization. When the word ambition appeared on the wall during Machetes aside, which helped to connect the theme Of ambition to Macbeth, as the aside is revealing his inner most thoughts. One thing would have changed in this production was the set. It did not change at all for all of Act 1, even though the setting changes from the battle field to Dunces castle, and they relied mostly on special affects rather than objects. The set was basic, but the cast was able to work efficiently with, and that is a testament to their talents. The casts ability to play multiple characters and to display a characters personality and motifs was very impressive. Lauren Debbie, who played Lady Macbeth, had a captivating performance. She made the character change from a ruthless and ambitious women to a women filled with guilt, who could not carry on knowing what she has done crystal clear and seamless. She irked with the props very efficiently, like using the bath tub to emphasize how her hands will never be clean, making it easy for the student audience to comprehend the major theme of guilt and its connection to Lady Macbeth. A change in speech was most noticeable in the witches. In some versions of Macbeth, the witches have a eerie, raspy voice, which helps the audience distinguish them as evil or supernatural, but in the play they spoke like the rest of the cast, which could have been misleading if you had heard dramatic recordings of the play. The porter scene was executed very well, and was perfect comic relief. The drunken, humorous mood of the porter got the audience re-engaged with the play and laughing, while reliving suspense from the murder of Duncan. This version of this scene was spot on to our groups analysis. It clearly got across the theme of equivocation and the symbol of the Machetes castle as hell. Something interesting to note character wise is that Dominance is not found in the production. Charles Rays take on Macbeth is original, has some downfalls but also has lots of positives. It compares well to a production of Macbeth I saw earlier HTHÂ ± year, and proves that no matter where the play is set in, the major themes like ambition play a role in periods of time and places. I enjoyed the play for the most part, especially enjoyed the acting, and thought it was a perfect length and in a beautiful theatre. I definitely recommend seeing this classical theatre project of the Shakespearean tragedy Macbeth.

William Blakes poem, The Lamb

William Blakes poem, The Lamb William Blake's poem "The Lamb" metaphorically refers to Christ as the Lamb who came as a child, and that we are made in His image; this speaking of the religious importance and influences at the time this poem was written. It seams Blake's style of poetry proclaimed the supremacy of the imagination over the rationalism and materialism of the 18th?century.William Blake is at first calling the lamb out as though it were an animal, "Little lamb, who made thee?...Gave thee clothing of delight, Dost thou know who made thee?" Blake is switching now in the latter half of his poem to the deity of Christ, "He is called by they name, For he calls himself a Lamb. He is meek and He is mild; He became a little child."Many of Blake's spellings which seem odd or old-fashioned to us, must have struck his readers, also, as quaint.Blake's illustration of "The Lamb"Blake does not necessarily use metaphors, where something in the poem represents some other thing, usually an abstraction, in a one-to-one way. Rather he uses symbols and leaves it to the reader to decide what they mean. The picture of The Lamb's feeding "by the stream and o'er the mead" is a beautiful one, which suggests God's kindness in creation, and has an echo of similar descriptions in the Old Testament book of Psalms. In the second stanza, Blake reminds the lamb, and us, that the God who made the lamb, also is like the lamb. As well as becoming a child (like the speaker of the poem) Jesus became known as The Lamb of God. Jesus was crucified during the Feast of the Passover (celebrating the Jews' escape from Egypt) when lambs were slaughtered in the temple at Jerusalem. This was believed to take away the sins...

Vodafone's sale of ownership of joint venture to Verizon Essay

Vodafone's sale of ownership of joint venture to Verizon - Essay Example It began its operations on April 4rd 2000. The birth of Verizon Wireless followed two years of spirited negotiations in the wake of a competitive marketplace and received regulatory approval within six months. It began trading on the New York Securities exchange on July 3rd 2000 and its shares were traded on the NASDAQ exchange on March 2010 (British Invisibles 2009, pg. 18). Under the partnership, Verizon Communication was to hold 55 per cent of the shares under its subsidiaries GTE Wireless Inc. 30.8% and Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC 24.2%. Vodafone would hold the remaining shares under its subsidiaries PCS Nucleus, L. P holding 6.2% and JV PartnerCo, LLC holding the remaining 38.8%. Verizon wireless went on an expansion spree, acquiring Virginia Wireless by the end of 2006 and Rural Cellular Corporation (Unicel) in July 30th 2007. More mergers were to follow with the acquisition of Ramcell in mid-2007 and Surewest communications on June 5th 2008 and by November 2008, Verizon wirele ss had consolidated its place as the largest wireless carrier in the United States. Its shares had also risen significantly. More success was achieved on May 8th 2009 when AT&T announced that it would be selling five Centennial Wireless service areas to Verizon wireless (Goldberg 2013, pg. 19). The successful buy out in 2013 that is expected to be completed in 2014 was preceded by many failed attempts to reach an agreement to sell Verizon wireless or to merge the two companies. In 2004, Vodafone consented to selling its stake in Verizon wireless to Verizon Communications if it acquired AT&T Wireless. However, this was not to be as Vodafone failed in its bid. The issue came up once again in a conference in Barcelona in 2009. Apparently disturbed by Vodafone’s lack of control over Verizon Wireless, Vodafone Managing Director, Colao stated that he would view the options of merging with Verizon Communications or selling Vodafone’s stake in Verizon wireless as a means of so lving the issue (UK Trade & Investment 2009, pg. 33). Although the partnership between Vodafone and Verizon Communications was characterized by much success and rapid expansion to become the most profitable carrier in the United States, the relationship between the partners was a stormy one with each unsuccessfully attempting to buy out the other. Bickering characterized the shaky relationship as the struggle to control the direction of the carrier took center-stage. Verizon felt that the partnership was preventing its independent operations and marketing strategies especially in areas where Vodafone operated. Many analysts concurred that Vodafone was benefiting more from the partnership in the wake of poor performance in the European and American market. With the two partners providing similar services to the same target market, each of them saw the need to operate independently and make strategic investment and marketing decisions independently. Verizon was also opposed to the ide a of paying dividends to Vodafone shareholders at a time when Vodafone was not paying dividends to its shareholders. Vodafone’s sale of ownership of joint venture to Verizon in cash and shares was one of the biggest in corporate history. Under the sale agreement, Vodafone received $130 billion in cash and stock from Verizon Communications in exchange for its 45% stake in Verizon